Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Child Support Scam Video
Why Are these parents paying child support for
20 year old man, not to him, but his mother???
Because 6 judges ordered it so and the mother and son
are collaberating in a bizarre child support scam.
Watch the video, now.
Judges Implement Never Ending Child Support Scam
20 Year Old, Capable Man, William Harris, stays in bed all day and his mother, Paulette Harris -Teacher, collects $4,000 per year in child support from Dad (tax free) and has done so for the last 6 years.
● Mother /teacher allows Will to stay home, in bed all day.
● He gets up mid afternoon.
● He doesn’t work or look for work.
● He doesn’t go to school.
● He doesn’t do chores.
● He does only what he wants.
● Judges continue to order child support from pensioner, Dad and teacher-Mom.
● Dad’s, (Victor Harris) payment goes to mom, mom’s payment goes to mom. Tax Free!
● Dad can’t get William Harris up and out working by long distance.
● Mother sabotages every attempt to get Will off child support.
● His own Doctor testifies there are no mental disabilities.
● Mother claims Will is mentally disabled- Provides no proof! No medical intervention.
● Will has above average intelligence.
● Will has no physical handicaps.
● Will has been allowed to do whatever he wants since he was 14.
● Mom/Teacher allows kid to drop out of school at 14 and do absolutely nothing.
● Will lies to Dad about taking classes, going to work and job hunting.
● Will fails to respond to any attempt to get him working full time.
● Dad as gone before 6 judges to terminate child support of adult!
● Mother continues to give hearsay testimony of mental illness. We don’t want to pay child support for an able bodied man for the rest of our lives.
● Mother wants to collect child support forever.
● We need your help!
● We are launching a Legal Defence Fund to terminate child support for an able bodied and mentally fit adult, who refuses to look for employment.
● Pensioner Dad has paid $24,000 to date, by court order, for man to do nothing,!!!
● Would you allow your children to do this?
“Help Get 20 Year Old William Harris Off Child Support”
Donate to: Brauer and Harris
1061 Mines Rd. Falmouth,
NS B0P 1L0
Phone 902.798.5267
Paypal Donations = cbrauer@lincsat.com
HELP STOP CHILD SUPPORT EXTORTION SCAM!
Sunday, March 04, 2007
VandenElsen sent back to prison; McDonald's restaurant killer gets passes
Hi All:
Here is an article that Rick Howe wrote in the Daily News:
|
One Care: free Trial Version Today!
Labels:
courts,
judicial abuse,
parole denied
Board denies VandenElsen parole again
10:20 AM 2/28/2007
Board denies VandenElsen parole again
Woman convicted in standoff improving but still deemed a risk
By MARY ELLEN MacINTYRE Truro Bureau
TRURO — Carline VandenElsen has done so well in prison she’s on early release at a Halifax halfway house but she hasn’t done well enough to get full parole.
"The risk is not manageable — application denied," Pat O’Brien of the National Parole Board said during a hearing at Nova Institution for Women on Tuesday.
Ms. VandenElsen has been a prisoner at the institution since her conviction in June 2005 on charges from a highly publicized three-day standoff with Halifax police in 2004.
The standoff began when police officers attempted to carry out a child apprehension order for her five-month-old daughter. Ms. VandenElsen’s husband, Larry Finck, was also sentenced to prison for his part in what has been called a bizarre and tragic situation.
After holding police at bay for three days, the couple left the home carrying Mr. Finck’s dead mother on an improvised stretcher, a shotgun and the baby.
Ms. VandenElsen was convicted of careless use of a shotgun, using a shotgun while committing an indictable offence and threatening to use a shotgun in committing an assault on police.
They were both convicted of abducting the baby in contravention of a child custody order, obstructing a police officer, possessing an unregistered shotgun and possessing a shotgun dangerous to the public peace.
Mr. Finck is being held at the Atlantic Institution in Renous, N.B., and is scheduled for release in March.
Ms. VandenElsen struggled to hold back tears when she heard the news Tuesday morning.
Corrections staff had recommended the 43-year-old gain full parole.
"She never picked up one charge here and never gave us any indication she was a risk," said her caseworker, Rod MacDonald.
"But she does have a difficult time trusting authority figures."
The caseworker said Ms. VandenElsen seemed to have a lot of sympathetic supporters and she planned to eventually live in the Annapolis Valley with a couple who have taken up her cause.
For the past month, she has been on what’s called a 60-day unescorted temporary absence, living at a halfway house in Halifax and volunteering at local churches. When she walked into the institution Tuesday morning, inmates hollered out to her, offering her good luck on her application.
Ms. VandenElsen was composed, well-spoken and agreeable during the hearing.
However, when a member of the board asked what she would do differently if she could go back to the time of the standoff, Ms. VandenElsen was unable to single out any one thing.
"It was the most harrowing, horrifying and traumatic experience in my life," she said of the event.
"Had I known this would transpire, I wouldn’t have had a baby," she said.
Mr. O’Brien told Ms. VandenElsen she is one of a kind.
"I’ve never seen a standoff with such drama — you’re unique," he said.
"I know what happens to children in foster care — I didn’t want a child of mine in foster care," she responded.
"I had a baby. I wanted to keep it and it was just a miserable, tragic situation all around," she said.
Asked what she wanted to do in the future, Ms. VandenElsen said she wanted to get on with her life.
"Just collect all these little bits and pieces of my life — I would like to reunite with my family — it’s a very primal feeling."
In delivering the board’s decision, Mr. O’Brien said members were not convinced Ms. VandenElsen understands what she did wrong.
"We never got the sense that at a fundamental level you think you ever did anything wrong."
( mmacintyre@herald.ca)
Board denies VandenElsen parole again
Woman convicted in standoff improving but still deemed a risk
By MARY ELLEN MacINTYRE Truro Bureau
TRURO — Carline VandenElsen has done so well in prison she’s on early release at a Halifax halfway house but she hasn’t done well enough to get full parole.
"The risk is not manageable — application denied," Pat O’Brien of the National Parole Board said during a hearing at Nova Institution for Women on Tuesday.
Ms. VandenElsen has been a prisoner at the institution since her conviction in June 2005 on charges from a highly publicized three-day standoff with Halifax police in 2004.
The standoff began when police officers attempted to carry out a child apprehension order for her five-month-old daughter. Ms. VandenElsen’s husband, Larry Finck, was also sentenced to prison for his part in what has been called a bizarre and tragic situation.
After holding police at bay for three days, the couple left the home carrying Mr. Finck’s dead mother on an improvised stretcher, a shotgun and the baby.
Ms. VandenElsen was convicted of careless use of a shotgun, using a shotgun while committing an indictable offence and threatening to use a shotgun in committing an assault on police.
They were both convicted of abducting the baby in contravention of a child custody order, obstructing a police officer, possessing an unregistered shotgun and possessing a shotgun dangerous to the public peace.
Mr. Finck is being held at the Atlantic Institution in Renous, N.B., and is scheduled for release in March.
Ms. VandenElsen struggled to hold back tears when she heard the news Tuesday morning.
Corrections staff had recommended the 43-year-old gain full parole.
"She never picked up one charge here and never gave us any indication she was a risk," said her caseworker, Rod MacDonald.
"But she does have a difficult time trusting authority figures."
The caseworker said Ms. VandenElsen seemed to have a lot of sympathetic supporters and she planned to eventually live in the Annapolis Valley with a couple who have taken up her cause.
For the past month, she has been on what’s called a 60-day unescorted temporary absence, living at a halfway house in Halifax and volunteering at local churches. When she walked into the institution Tuesday morning, inmates hollered out to her, offering her good luck on her application.
Ms. VandenElsen was composed, well-spoken and agreeable during the hearing.
However, when a member of the board asked what she would do differently if she could go back to the time of the standoff, Ms. VandenElsen was unable to single out any one thing.
"It was the most harrowing, horrifying and traumatic experience in my life," she said of the event.
"Had I known this would transpire, I wouldn’t have had a baby," she said.
Mr. O’Brien told Ms. VandenElsen she is one of a kind.
"I’ve never seen a standoff with such drama — you’re unique," he said.
"I know what happens to children in foster care — I didn’t want a child of mine in foster care," she responded.
"I had a baby. I wanted to keep it and it was just a miserable, tragic situation all around," she said.
Asked what she wanted to do in the future, Ms. VandenElsen said she wanted to get on with her life.
"Just collect all these little bits and pieces of my life — I would like to reunite with my family — it’s a very primal feeling."
In delivering the board’s decision, Mr. O’Brien said members were not convinced Ms. VandenElsen understands what she did wrong.
"We never got the sense that at a fundamental level you think you ever did anything wrong."
( mmacintyre@herald.ca)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)